Whitelist Infinity Ground on VIP

Initia Governance VIP
1

0. Proposer Info

  • Email : [hello@infinityg.ai]
  • Proposer’s Project Name : [Infinity Ground]
  • Proposer’s Project URL : [https://www.infinityg.ai/]
  • Proposer’s X (Twitter) Account : [https://x.com/infinityg_ai]

1. TL;DR

This proposal requests the whitelisting of [Infinity Ground] to Initia’s VIP (Vested Interest Program).

2. Background

2-1 About the Project

  • Protocol Name : [Infinity Ground]
  • Protocol Blurb: [Infinity Ground is the first AI App Store featuring a decentralized Intelligent Development Environment (IDE), empowering everyone to create, deploy, and monetize DApps like Games, Web Apps, DeFi, RWA and Entertainment experiences using natural language.]
  • Protocol Type : [AI]
  • Docs : [https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/]
  • Audits : [N/A]

3. Rationale & Impact

  • Motivation and benefit to the Interwoven Economy :
    • Infinity Ground is the first AI App Store featuring a decentralized Intelligent Development Environment (IDE), empowering anyone to create, deploy, and monetize DApps—including games, web apps, DeFi, RWA, and entertainment experiences—using natural language. The platform provides an intuitive and accessible interface that unlocks limitless creativity and creation, while rewarding contributors through a decentralized incentive network.
    • Being whitelisted on VIP will accelerate our early-stage growth during mainnet launch, especially through our debut campaign “Jump Jennie” which will:
      • Drive onchain play volume : Users pay entry fees in $INIT to participate in the game, generating significant real onchain activity.
      • Boost user growth and retention : The lightweight but competitive gameplay encourages daily engagement, increasing DAU/MAU.
      • Expand INIT utility : INIT is used for payments, rewards, and staking, reinforcing its role and value within the ecosystem.
      • Create a sustainable growth loop : A portion of game revenue will be used for staking and Cabal bribes, further aligning our growth with Initia’s governance and ecosystem expansion.
  • VIP Scoring Criteria (Details)
    • We will use the following formula to determine user scores and distribute INIT rewards each epoch: (User’s Onchain Play Count / Total Onchain Play Count)
      • Onchain Play (100%)
        • Measured by how many times the user pays the $INIT entry fee to play.
        • Counted on-chain via wallet interactions with the game contract.

4. Proposal Details

Field Value Example Description
Operator Address 0xc2a076d6c872c1be37182c225ba81bfcdf4c9754 init1wul4rtjagr0cnrqey4ewl98j3v2uthapeh6q0vfns35d35l8qamsfc9gxu The address eligible to claim a portion of the VIP rewards allocated to the rollup team as commission. This address does not need to be a system key (like admin or bridge executor).
Bridge ID 27 938 An identifier automatically generated during the setup of the bridge between the Rollup and Initia.
Bridge Address init1wul4rtjagr0cnrqey4ewl98j3v2uthapeh6q0vfns35d35l8qamsfc9gxu The L1 address where tokens are locked when bridging from L1 to L2. This address is auto-generated during bridge setup.
Scoring Contract Address 0x0b98068c3Da8b8dE0c155a55C95850f97361AA86 init1qa4hswlcjmttulj0q9qa46jf64f93pecl6tydcsjldfe0hy5ju0set9tc9 The contract deployed on the rollup that assigns VIP scores to users. These scores are snapshotted on L1 and used to build a Merkle tree for VIP reward distribution.
Operator Commission Max Rate 0.25 0.2 The maximum commission rate the rollup can configure.
Operator Commission Max Change 0.05 0.2 The maximum allowed change in the commission rate per update. For example, if OCR is 0.3 and OCMC is 0.2, OCR can only be adjusted between 0.1 and 0.5.
Operator Commission Rate 0.2 0.2 The actual commission rate. If 100 INIT is distributed and OCR is 0.2, the rollup team receives 20 INIT.
VM EVM EVM The VM type of the rollup is using.

Governance Votes

  • YES – You support whitelisting this rollup on VIP with the parameters provided.
  • NO – You do not support adding this rollup on VIP.
  • NO WITH VETO – You believe this proposal is harmful, spam, or violates governance principles.
  • ABSTAIN – You choose not to vote for or against but wish your vote to count toward quorum.