[Whitelist / Delist / Update Parameters for] [X-INIT] Pool in Enshrined Liquidity

0. Proposer Info

  • Email: [insert proposer email]
  • Proposer’s Project Name: [insert project name]
  • Proposer’s X (Twitter) Account: [insert X profile URL]
  • Affiliation: [State whether proposer is affiliated with the protocol or a token in the pool]

1. TL;DR

Proposing to [Whitelist / Delist / Update Parameters for] the token pair [X-INIT] for Enshrined Liquidity.

Summary of the motivation and expected impact:

[1–2 sentences]


2. Background

2-1. Token Pair Info & Context:

  • Token Name / Symbol: [X]
  • LP Pair: [X-INIT]
  • Pool Type:
  • Pool Parameters:

2-2. Token Details

  • Name: [Insert name]

  • Symbol: [Insert symbol]

  • Origin Chain: [Insert origin chain]

    • state where the token minting happens
  • Contract Address: [Insert address]

  • Total Supply Cap: [Insert or N/A]

  • Circulating Supply: [Insert current supply]

  • Token Type: [LST / Stablecoin / Governance / Other]

  • Upgradability: [Yes/No] + Details

  • Control: [Multisig / DAO / Permissionless]

  • Contract Verified? [Yes/No]

  • Special Mechanics: [e.g., Custom mint/burn, Peg stability, etc.]

  • Bridge Used: [Insert name]

    • only include this field if the token to-be-whitelisted is a bridged token

3. Proposed Parameters

Field Proposed Value Example Description
Reward Weight 1000000000000000000 RewardWeight is registered to distribution’s Params
Token Metadata 0x… Dex coin LP metadata address

4. Rationale & Impact

Explain why this token should be added/removed or why parameters should be adjusted:

  • Economic Rationale: [e.g., incentivize liquidity, adjust for market activity, rebalance emissions]
  • Ecosystem Impact: [e.g., benefits for LPs, protocol alignment, risk mitigation]
  • Community Consideration: [e.g., requested by dApp teams, community sentiment]

Governance Votes

  • YES – You support the proposed change to Enshrined Liquidity.
  • NO – You do not support the change.
  • NO WITH VETO – You believe the proposal is harmful, spam, or violates governance principles.
  • ABSTAIN – You are neutral but want to contribute to quorum.

References / Appendix (Optional)

  • [Link to code or registry entry]
  • [Forum thread or previous discussions]
  • [Relevant data, analysis, or dashboards]
  • [Additional context or visualizations, if any]